Enron Mail

From:dale.neuner@enron.com
To:stacy.dickson@enron.com
Subject:ANR ML7
Cc:kevin.ruscitti@enron.com, sheri.thomas@enron.com
Bcc:kevin.ruscitti@enron.com, sheri.thomas@enron.com
Date:Wed, 19 Jul 2000 01:24:00 -0700 (PDT)

Stacey -

Below are two e-mails sent to you on their respective dates. I think we are
ready to push on with the ANR ML7 Delivery Location and have suggested some
language based on comments from Kevin (e-mail dated 5-12). Kevin has called
and asked for this product. Please offer comments/approval.


5/31/00

I spoke with Mark Schrab in Logistics about the ANR ML7 Product that Kevin
Ruscettit would like to start trading and he wasn't able to dispell any
beliefs that this is a product that should not be traded, OTC or otherwise.

Mark explained that often times on this pipe there were cuts due to
operational constraints. I explained that we had drafted language to
contemplate these occurances. I then asked Mark what would happen if there
was a cut due to op constraints, and Mark explained that he would try to find
another Buyer along the pipe. I probed further, and found that there would be
no revision of the contract, nor a re-pricing of the transaction due to the
re-scheduling. I then read Mark the language under consideration (making sure
he understood that this was conceptual) and he agreed that the language
provided for something that we are already doing operationally. Mark had
never seen the language we propse for use for this Product.

I think Logistics may have been issuing an opinion on their point without
being fully aware of what we were attempting to offer, and I certainly don't
blame them for doing so - as we all make decisions based on the information
at hand.

I would like to proceed with this Product.

Dale

5/12/00

I spoke with Kevin Ruscetti, the trader, and Kevin has clarified for me that
the product he intends to trade on ANR ML7 is NOT Interruptable gas, but
rather subject to operational constraints like Socal Topock. He did request,
however, that we make reference to secondary firm delivery.

Below please find the op constraints language that we use. I also added a
secondary delivery blurb; please feel free to edit - and then I'll get this
in front of Kevin for his review.


The transaction is for delivery at the ANR Pipeline Company ML7
interconnect. The volumes scheduled to be
delivered are subject to reductions due to normal operational constraints on
the ANR Pipeline Company pipelines
based upon historical operating conditions. The reductions caused by these
constraints are excused
nonperformance and are not considered a failure to receive or deliver firm
gas. In the event that the volumes
scheduled are reduced due to such normal operational constraints occur, Buyer
may designate
a secondary firm delivery location.