Enron Mail

From:elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To:janet.moore@enron.com
Subject:Maine retail license for EPMI
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:08:00 -0800 (PST)

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000
03:08 PM ---------------------------



From: Christi L Nicolay 01/21/2000 04:47 PM


To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zurita/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Maine retail license for EPMI

Here are comments on the draft:

12. "Location, if any, of any office available to the general public or
Maine customers:" The draft says "N/A". Shouldn't we put in Houston
office? Dan A's office?

13. Customer rep. --Ramona in Dublin is EES customer rep. Who will be ENA's?

15. Should EPMI's response be limited to supplied RETAIL electricity in
these jurisdictions? Otherwise, all 48 states should be listed for EPMI.
Also, the current EES sales in NEPOOL (New Hampshire and Rhode Island, I
think) are made by EPMI. There was/is also a retail sale in the MAPP area by
EPMI, I think.

21. EES' response is not exactly true with regard to EPMI, since it has been
involved in civil legal actions. However, does this really request any civil
cases? Can we answer by saying "no enforcement proceedings by any state in
which EPMI is providing retail sales of electricity?"

Tom, The application says "Q" is attached as other supporting material, but I
can't find Q. Also, you marked the Annual Electric Utility Report for 1998
as "A", but I am not sure where it should go ("A" is already answered.)

Thanks for the information.