Enron Mail

From:richard.sanders@enron.com
To:scott.sefton@enron.com
Subject:Interfert
Cc:britt.davis@enron.com
Bcc:britt.davis@enron.com
Date:Tue, 22 Jun 1999 07:23:00 -0700 (PDT)

Is this the usual way Freshfield bills? Out of principle, I would ask for
itemize bills. Please give me your thoughts.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/22/99
02:19 PM ---------------------------


Britt Davis@ENRON
06/17/99 10:29 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirley Davey/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Interfert

You may recall that I received a bill from Freshfield's for their work in
this case in the amount of FF 120,000 (approximately $24,000). Because it
was not itemized, I sent it back for itemization. I have since received from
Freshfield's a letter of June 11, attaching a description of the services
performed, but with no mention of the hours spent, either for the whole job,
or for each item. I will send a copy of this to you for your review.

I am not familiar with Freshfield's billing practices generally or whether
ECT has any agreement with Freshfield's for providing specific billing
formats. I do not want to strain ECT's relationship with Freshfield's by
asking for more information if that is not reasonable to do.

Richard and Linda, would one of you provide me some guidance as to whether
you need additional information from Freshfield's or not? Thanks.


B.K.D.