RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: Gail Brownfeld
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

That all depends on your definition of the word"job." It was actually
anticlimactic---Mark told Bob he needed to stick around on some of the old EI
litigation, a fact we already knew. Are you at the Sempra deposition. how is
it going?

Gail Brownfeld/ENRON@enronXgate
03/07/2001 03:06 PM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT
COMMUNICATION

He keeps saying that he "needs" the $15 million. Maybe it's a budget thing.
I think he really just wants to renegotiate the deal. I don't think he
thinks that IHI has the money to pay us back.
What happened at the meeting on Monday with Mark? Do I still have a job?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanders, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:02 PM
To: Brownfeld, Gail
Subject: RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT
COMMUNICATION

Thanks. I have no idea why Enerson is being so panicky.