|
|
Enron Mail |
Include these questions to JB in the Ecogas SA letter
Randal Maffett 08/11/2000 02:28 PM To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Yesterday's discussion Read JB's response to my phone call below. I'm not sure what's going on but if you read the info I had sent to you (via intercompany mail), there are a number of questions which are relevant: Why does M. Panelo's e-mail reference JB's ownership being 33%? Why is JB's signature on the MOU Amendment? What is his authority as a signatory? If he's not an officer of this "Ecogas S.A." then why is his signature evidenced? We're trying to track down the faxes he referenced below. Once received, I'll forward them if they're pertinent. RTM ---------------------- Forwarded by Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 01:44 PM --------------------------- Jerrel Branson <jerrel@ecogas.com< on 08/11/2000 12:03:41 PM To: "'Randal.Maffett@enron.com'" <Randal.Maffett@enron.com< cc: "'rstephens@bracepatt.com'" <rstephens@bracepatt.com<, "'spieringer@lockeliddell.com'" <spieringer@lockeliddell.com< Subject: Yesterday's discussion Randy, I am concerned about our conversation of yesterday morning. I sent by fax to you all relevant documents I have concerning any South American details which have Ecogas involvement. As stated over the phone and set out in the documents, I have never had any ownership interest in any corporation, partnership, joint-venture, etc. for South America relating to Ecogas. The documents which you suggest you have cannot represent any such interest as it does not and never has existed. I simply would not act in that manner and would have expected you to hold that understanding. Given the status of Ecogas' operations currently I want to suggest that we all direct our total efforts to resolution of that crisis, rather than continuing personal distractions and devisiveness. Regards, Jerrel
|