|
|
Enron Mail |
John Quinn, one of our (many)litigators in California was approached by David Boies' firm about getting involved in the Quinque matter. He called me, learned that we were a defendant, and declined Boies' offer to get involved. I have attached the Boies firm response. I think the danger of allowing the Quinn Emmanuel firm to get involved far outweighs the benefit of getting a release. The release may be shortlived. Enron could be added to Quinque or a Quinque copycat by another Plaintiffs atty. Furthurmore, their involvement in Quinque could result in the development of evidence adverse to our position in the Grynberg case. What are your thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001 11:57 AM ----- "John Quinn" <jbq@quinnemanuel.com< 05/22/2001 01:34 PM To: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com< cc: Subject: Fwd: Re(2): Re(2): Pipeline Matter (Robert Silver) here's the latest--if we agree to get involved in this, they will dismiss enron defts if it is ok with you Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from fc.bsfllp.com ([63.175.205.3]) by mail.qeuo.com; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:26:06 -0700 Message-id: <fc.007ea908000402a13b9aca0013667a77.402bd@fc.bsfllp.com< Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:25:53 -0400 Subject: Re(2): Re(2): Pipeline Matter (Robert Silver) To: jbq@quinnemanuel.com Cc: rsilver@bsfllp.com From: "Edward Normand" <enormand@bsfllp.com< References: <sb0a4b97.090@mail.qeuo.com< In-Reply-To: <sb0a4b97.090@mail.qeuo.com< MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think it would be worth pursuing that option with your client. If it meant the involvement of your firm (to any significant extent), the plaintiffs would likely agree to dismiss the Enron defendants.
|