|
|
Enron Mail |
I am ok. We have gotten into trouble before when we used a different address or fax# that the one contained in the contract. Send it to as many addresses as you have but check the one in the contract.
-----Original Message----- From: Williams, Robert C. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:05 AM To: Sanders, Richard B. Subject: FW: Forward Contract Termination Notices I'm going to use my one-sentence letter unless you guys have a problem. -----Original Message----- From: Lacyr@sullcrom.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Lacyr+40sullcrom+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:26 PM To: Williams, Robert C. Subject: RE: Forward Contract Termination Notices The attachment to Ms. Sager's letter did not come with the copy you forwarded to me, but the text you proposed seems to me to say everything necessary, and I'm generally in favor of not saying anything more than that. Section 15.2 of the Unisil agreement gives an address for notices. If Unisil Aquisition is still using that address, I would send the notice there. Otherwise, I would make sure it gets to Unisil's management. -----Original Message----- From: Robert.C.Williams@ENRON.com [mailto:Robert.C.Williams@ENRON.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:13 PM To: lacyr@sullcrom.com Cc: Richard.B.Sanders@ENRON.com Subject: RE: Forward Contract Termination Notices Rob, Is my short version okay? Looks like we've been wordier in the past. < -----Original Message----- < From: Sanders, Richard B. < Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:29 AM < To: Williams, Robert C. < Subject: FW: Forward Contract Termination Notices < < < < -----Original Message----- < From: Sager, Elizabeth < Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 11:44 AM < To: Sanders, Richard B.; Hodge, Jeffrey T. < Subject: RE: Forward Contract Termination Notices < < Here is the form of PG&E letter that we used after consultation with < LaBoeuf - it has a few more words. < << File: ees.DOC << < < -----Original Message----- < From: Sanders, Richard B. < Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 7:08 PM < To: Sager, Elizabeth; Hodge, Jeffrey T. < Subject: FW: Forward Contract Termination Notices < < < EES wants to terminate energy contracts(futures cintracts) with < two bankrupt entities. Can you let Bob Williams know if you have any < comments/suggestions to his letter? < -----Original Message----- < From: Williams, Robert C. < Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:32 PM < To: Frazier, Lamar; Dotson, Marcus < Cc: Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki; < 'lengels@brobeck.com'; 'jwhite@brobeck.com'; 'lacyr@sullcrom.com'; < Smith, Mike < Subject: Forward Contract Termination Notices < < Pending Mark Haedicke's okay, here are my suggested termination < notices to Unisil and Tri-Valley Growers: < < UNISIL: < < [Date} < < [Jason to provide attorney name] < < < < Re: Power Sales Agreement between UniSil < Corporation and Enron Energy Marketing Corp., < successor by merger to PG&E Energy < Services Corp.("EEMC"), originally entered into < between EEMC and UniSil Corp. as of < December 5, 1997, and subsequently assigned < to UniSil Acquisition Corp. (the < "Agreement") < < Dear ___________: < < Pursuant to Section 3.3.2 of the Agreeement < and Section 556 of the Bankruptcy Code, EEMC hereby terminates < the Agreement, effective immediately. < < < Very truly yours, < < < Marcus? < < < TRI VALLEY GROWERS: < < < < [Date] < < < [Marcus--who is Tri Valley Growers' < bankruptcy counsel?] < < < Re: Retail Power Sales Contract between Tri < Valley Growers and Enron Energy Marketing Corp., successor < by merger to PG&E Energy Services < Corp. ("EEMC"), entered into as of August 28, 1998 (the "Contract") < < [Same as UniSil except Contract not < Agreement] < < < < ---------------------------------- This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
|