Re: FW: Tenaska Failure Investigation

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 10:13
AM ---------------------------

Charles Ward@ENRON
10/25/2000 07:27 PM
To: Mike Mazowita/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Mike Gough" <mike.gough@naes.com<, Carl
Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: FW: Tenaska Failure Investigation

I agree on continuing to use the thin seal if row 1 blades are the root cause.

I spoke with various SWPC folks today and yesterday. We should be receiving
a comprehensive schedule by the end of the week with item detail and timing
for the outage. I mentioned that the lack of regular notification of the
outage repair schedule was unacceptable. We'll see. I also mentioned that
Brazos sent us a letter that was headed towards a "fit for usage" issue in
the PPA and that ENA would look through any assertion to that as a SWPC
problem. Additionally, I mentioned that a CEO-level meeting was scheduled
for next week to discuss the technical issues of various projects in the
portfolio and that the SWPC situation (Tenaska and our delayed delivery) were
item 1 on the agenda. I also passed to SWPC that we bust the 65% before we
bust the 80% test and that accordingly, a December finish is unacceptable.
Fudges just a little, buit its frankly none of their business what the real
date is. I also reminded them that they owe me a fixed-price labor proposal
by the end of the week.

Back in the office on Friday.

Chuck