![]() |
Enron Mail |
Kevin:
Sara and I were discussing the additional utility provisions that we typically insert into our ISDA MAster Schedule when we are dealing with a regulated counterparty. As a general rule, most of these counterparties object to such provisions. In light of this, we thought that as a compromise we would eliminate the Information Sheet, the "additional reps" and the additional covenants and rely on inserting the following as an Additional Termination Event: "the filing of a motion, pleading, application or other similar action in any proceeding or action by Party B, a commission, regulatory agency or other entity having jurisdiction over Party B, in respect of Party B, or in respect of any other similarly situated entity organized under the laws of the state(s) in which Party B is located or regulated to the effect that performance under this Agreement or one or more Transactions hereunder or similar agreements is unlawful or that this Agreement or one or more Transactions hereunder or similar agreements are void or voidable." What do you think about this? Alos, have you had a chance to come up with a revised definition for "Affiliate" that we could use in our setoff provisions? I look forward to hearing from you. Carol
|