|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: alan.aronowitz@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, susan.musch@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: alan.aronowitz@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, susan.musch@enron.com X-From: Jane McBride X-To: Sara Shackleton X-cc: Alan Aronowitz, Mark Taylor, Susan Musch X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Japan X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S X-FileName: sshackle.nsf Dear Sara, I am not sure of what the relevant considerations are for selecting a governing law for an internal agreement but if EJ agrees to NY or Texas then this should work, particularly given the identity and location of the counterparty and the location of the head office of Enron Corp. Hope this is helpful. Jane McBride Tel.: 81-3-5219-4500 (Main) 81-3-5219-4553 (Direct) Fax: 81-3-5219-4510 Sara Shackleton@ECT 2001/02/17 08:45 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Representative Agreement between Enron Japan Corp. and Enron North America Corp. (the "Services Agreement") Jane: Susan is trying to revise the Services Agreement once again and the "governing law" issue was raised. I do not have any memoranda addressing which choice of law would be binding on Enron Japan Corp. However, I note that the draft ISDA marked by our Japanese counsel for use by Enron Japan Corp. and IBJ elects New York law (AA email to me dated 9/21/00). Are either Texas or New York law preferable for the Services Agreement? Thanks for your assistance. Regards. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com
|