RE: EOL Amendment

Attached is the list which I created when Mark left town on August 31. He sent a rash of emails to me (from Stacy) and I assigned per the list. I had Texaco on my list because he mentioned it to me in a voice mail. If there are any names missing from the list, let me know. Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Theriot, Kim S.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: RE: EOL Amendment

The decision that was made early on was that we were only going to tackle Gas and Power first. I am concerned that there may be other amendments that Stacy has sent to Mark which you may not have....

Kim

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:58 AM
To: Theriot, Kim S.
Cc: Dickson, Stacy E.; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject: RE: EOL Amendment

Kim: Sorry for the mixup. Attached is my redlined version of Stacy's form. Do we need to add references to crude? Sara

<< File: EOLTexacoamendR2.doc <<

-----Original Message-----
From: Theriot, Kim S.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Moore, Janet H.
Subject: FW: EOL Amendment

Sara,
Attached is the EOL Amendment that Stacy Dickson has already prepared for Texaco and sent to Mark. Power does not need to see it as stated below since Power does not do any business with Texaco. Can you incorporate your financial comments into the version below?

Kim

-----Original Message-----
From: Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc: Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject: EOL Amendment

Mark,
Attached is an EOL Amendment for the Texaco entities. EPMI does not trade power with Texaco so Janet does not need to see this amendment.

Stacy

<< File: EOLTexacoamend.doc <<