RE: Forward detail

Call me. Enron MW LLC will be treated like any third party. Since we do not have our trading order, there are no unwinds or terminations and we do not have special preference for dealing with affiliates. If this is in the money to ENA, we may be able to expedite the process but we are still dealing with a debtor. I'm not sure that the relationship to ENA bears different treatment.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: FW: Forward detail

Richard Tomaski (Chicago office) tells me that Enron Midwest (wholly owned sub of ENA) has certain hedges in place with RMT and perhaps ENA, relating to physical positions we had. The gas is being sold on Tuesday, so they want to close out these hedges, by unwinding or terminating.

Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this?

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Tomaski, Richard
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: FW: Forward detail

Thanks for your help.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tomaski, Richard
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:41 PM
To: Hodge, Jeffrey T.; McMichael Jr., Ed; Whiting, Greg
Subject: Forward detail

Here is the same list seperated by physcial and financial

<< File: MTMforwarddetail010902.xls <<