|
|
Enron Mail |
The problems I see are as follows:
1) most of the people in the room are technical people (ISO focused) and not familiar with PR efforts/plans. Some have brought PR people on board, but it was late in the process. 2) Edison Mission, Keyspan and Morgan Stanley have always had reservations from day one. All for different reasons. Others have joined them...Constellation, Aquila (i'm not sure why). 3) Some of the companies are saying different things: Constellation on the one hand wants to be in "everyone's rolodex as the coalition that the press calls for information regarding competitive market structure in NY" and then they say they don't want anyone to know they're in the coalition. ???? 4) Mirant wants to lop onto what IPPNY is doing (very small, cheap effort targeted at Albany and bringing on new supply). 5) Dynegy wants (given the situation) for SSK to give us messge points and then assignments for all of us to go meet with people as individual companies not as a coaltion. (this is where I think we waste our money) 6) Budget has always been an issue if we do the SSK plan -- it's not cheap but it gets us the traction we're looking for. 7) I don't think it's falling apart in the 11th hour as much as I think people have always had reservations and/or different views of how we would exist and maybe we were miscommunicating the whole time (although based on the materials, I thought it was pretty straightforward what we were considering doing all along". 8) Maybe Howard can give you something else that I'm missing. 9) I'll keep y ou posted. Richard Shapiro 05/22/01 09:17 AM To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: ESES Documents Why the hesitation on the part of coalition members( some or all?) at the 11th hour? From: Janel Guerrero on 05/22/2001 09:05 AM To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: ESES Documents See bottom two for details of plan - 18.xls - ESESMessageActionMemo.doc - ESESActionCalendar.xls
|