|
|
Enron Mail |
-----Original Message----- From: =09Chad Landry =20 Sent:=09Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:04 PM To:=09Jean Ryall Subject:=09HB 1492 and HB 1148 This is just a brief analysis of the two bills. It may be helpful. CKL ---------------------- Forwarded by Chad Landry/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001 11:03= AM --------------------------- =20 Chad Landry 05/02/2001 05:11 PM To:=09Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON cc:=09=20 Subject:=09HB 1492 and HB 1148 Jean- As we discussed, Stan Nelson of the Enron Transportation Services Group has= concerns regarding HB 1148 (Relating to the notice of proposed constructio= n for certain wireless communication facilities) and HB 1492 (Relating to n= otice and marking requirements for certain antenna structures). Stan feels= that if HB 1148 becomes law our tower and radio sites would need contant a= dministrative and legal attention to stay in compliance with the rules. He= feels that this bill is far more costly and burdensome to Enron than the c= urrent Federal Regulations. Stan also feels that if HB 1492 becomes law th= en the State of Texas could force us (Enron) to go beyond the Federal Regu= lations (47 C. F. R. Part 17) by requiring us (Enron) to adopt more stringe= nt standards for all antenna structures less than 200 feet. The current Fed= eral Regulations that are in place relate solely to antenna structures that= are greater than 200 feet and/or fall within the glide slope curves of air= ports or other aviation type facilities. As a side note, I sent a copy of these two bills along with Stan's analysis= to Scott Bolton and Sue Nord on Monday of this week and I have not gotten = any response from either of them. If you look below you will find: a copy of the most recent bill, a full his= tory, and a Word document from Stan Nelson where he explains in detail the = effects of these two Bills (HB 1148 and HB 1492) on Enron. Stan Nelson's Comments: =20 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09HB 1492 fg H Filed 2-12-01 30% H Introduced and referred to committee on House = Transportation 2-13-01 29% H Hearing set for 2:00 P.M. or Adj., E2.030 = -- House Transportation 4-17-01 36% H Committee action pending House Tran= sportation 4-17-01 18% H Voted favorably from committee as substituted H= ouse Transportation 4-18-01 54% H Reported from committee as substituted= House Transportation 4-26-01 55% =09 HB 1492=20 =20 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09HB 1148 House Description of Action Date Stat H Filed 2- 1-01 30% H Introdu= ced and referred to committee on House County Affairs 2- 7-01 29% H Hear= ing set for 7:30 A.M., E1.026 -- House County Affairs 3-21-01 36% H Comm= ittee action pending House County Affairs 3-21-01 18% H Voted favorably = from committee as substituted House County Affairs 4- 4-01 54% H Reporte= d from committee as substituted House County Affairs 4-16-01 55% H Set o= n the House Calendar 4-25-01 54% H Laid out for discussion 3:50pm 4-25-01= H Committee substitute adopted 4-25-01 70% H 1 Floor amendment(s) ado= pted 4-25-01 65% H Passed to third reading 4-25-01 70% H Laid out for = discussion 3:03pm 4-26-01 H Passed 4-26-01 67% S Received in the Senat= e - Referred to Senate Business and Commerce 4-30-01 68% =09 HB 1148 =20 CKL <Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)<
|