|
|
Enron Mail |
Bob, how should we handle this? Should Sue Mara, Jeane or I contact SCE concerning the late fees?
---------------------- Forwarded by Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES on 10/10/2001 03:24 PM --------------------------- JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com< on 10/10/2001 02:53:12 PM To: "'dhuddles@enron.com'" <dhuddles@enron.com< cc: Subject: RE: SCE Late Charges Diann -- properly disputed charges are not suppose to be subject to late fees. -----Original Message----- From: dhuddles@enron.com [mailto:dhuddles@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:31 PM To: jbennett@gmssr.com Cc: Wanda.Curry@enron.com; Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com; Robert.C.Williams@enron.com; ehughes2@enron.com Subject: SCE Late Charges Jeane, I have evidence on some DA bills where SCE has assessed late fees on disputed bills. I haven't been able to do a thorough analysis, but knowing the amount we have disputed so far, the charges could be substantial. I understood that, until the CPUC makes a decision, the UDC can not charge late fees on disputed bills. Correct? ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
|