![]() |
Enron Mail |
Becky --
FYI. Does EGM have any past advocacy on NURF? Jim -----Original Message----- From: Nicolay, Christi L. Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:04 AM To: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan Subject: FW: NURF NURF (Non-Uniform Rate of Flow) is a proposal currently being discussed at GISB to have hourly firm service on pipelines. It becomes a cost allocation issue as to who pays for the extra compression etc that may be necessary. -----Original Message----- From: Corman, Shelley Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:45 AM To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Hartsoe, Joe Subject: RE: NURF The paper is, for the most part, a fair representation of the NURF discussions ( I'd part with a few of the statements made in 6, 7, & 8). While the ETS pipelines participated in the development of the outline to ensure that the principles were sound, we do not have any present plans to file a NURF service. When and if we have real customers that want to contract for NURF service, we will make a filing. Even though we don't plan any immediate NURF service, I think the dialogue was still useful in making sure that generators understand the operational challenges of serving hourly swings. -----Original Message----- From: Nicolay, Christi L. Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:35 PM To: Corman, Shelley; Hartsoe, Joe Subject: NURF I read a paper on NURF (from Dynegy attorney). What is our pipeline position? Thanks
|