Enron Mail

From:d..steffes@enron.com
To:l..nicolay@enron.com, w..cantrell@enron.com
Subject:FW: NURF
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 19 Sep 2001 06:11:37 -0700 (PDT)

Becky --

FYI. Does EGM have any past advocacy on NURF?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan
Subject: FW: NURF

NURF (Non-Uniform Rate of Flow) is a proposal currently being discussed at GISB to have hourly firm service on pipelines. It becomes a cost allocation issue as to who pays for the extra compression etc that may be necessary.

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Hartsoe, Joe
Subject: RE: NURF

The paper is, for the most part, a fair representation of the NURF discussions ( I'd part with a few of the statements made in 6, 7, & 8). While the ETS pipelines participated in the development of the outline to ensure that the principles were sound, we do not have any present plans to file a NURF service. When and if we have real customers that want to contract for NURF service, we will make a filing. Even though we don't plan any immediate NURF service, I think the dialogue was still useful in making sure that generators understand the operational challenges of serving hourly swings.



-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:35 PM
To: Corman, Shelley; Hartsoe, Joe
Subject: NURF

I read a paper on NURF (from Dynegy attorney). What is our pipeline position? Thanks