RE: Anti-competitive Subgroup

Janine --

Where does this stand? I just read the text and agree with Harry. Most importantly, the HHI may not be suitable given the high degree of regulation of ComEd service.

As important, I don't think the ICC cares too much about Enron losing market share. Not the best lead argument.

Let's talk.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Kingerski, Harry
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Migden, Janine; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: Anti-competitive Subgroup

Janine - this is getting insane. With all due respect to Marc, this has nothing to do with the issues at hand.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ulrich, Marc
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Migden, Janine; rspilky@newenergy.com; poconnor@newenergy.com; jhextell@newenergy.com; dfabrizius@kaztex.com; Christopher.townsend@pipperrudnick.com
Cc: Sharfman, Guy; Surface, Jerald; Kendall, Heath; Kingerski, Harry; Boston, Roy
Subject: Anti-competitive Subgroup

Here is a copy of my uncompleted 1st draft of my testimony. I will hopefully be finishing this week.
<< File: M-Ulrich Direct Testimony.doc <<

Also here is a proposed agenda for today's conference call at 3pm

<< File: Agenda ComEd 2001 DST Rate Case 08-06-01.doc <<

Call number and pass code are as follows.

Monday, August 6, 2001 from 3 p.m. - 4 p.m. CST.
800-991-9019. Passcode 7314194#.

Marc L. Ulrich
713-345-4784 (office)
877-720-7711 (pager)