![]() |
Enron Mail |
Thanks Janine. Also, please keep Paul Kaufman and Jean Ryall in the loop. =
We need to make sure that we do this nationally. =20 Thanks. Jim -----Original Message----- From: =09Migden, Janine =20 Sent:=09Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:48 AM To:=09Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D. Cc:=09Montovano, Steve Subject:=09EES Market I met with Jim Woods to discuss reviewing the states that are open and taki= ng a targeted approach to most efficiently leverage our resources towards t= earing down barriers in states where we have a significant market opportuni= ty with a value proposition. Steve, to your question the other day as to how much market opportunity the= re is, what I gleaned from the meeting is that there are a number of opport= unities that could take us through 2002, but after that it starts to dwindl= e unless we can mine deeper in states where we have been active. However, = the other interesting point is that EES does not have resources to necessar= ily determine where the value proposition is and is looking to us to presen= t to them what we think might be markets that will work for them. Thus, th= ere may very well be more opportunities than they are currently focused on.= As preliminary step, Steve Montovano and I had talked about getting a doc= ument together that gives the high level summary of each state as a startin= g point. Lynette Barnes has worked on such a document and Kathleen Sulliva= n is going to work with her further and get a draft to Steve and I for revi= ew and distribution to EES. Jim was very interested in seeing such a docum= ent. Jim also noted that a state that has opportunities in the first year,= may not in the second, but could reemerge in the third. Jim, Jim Wood also mentioned that he had talked to you about a more coordin= ated approach to EES and government affairs working together. Jim and I ar= e going to exchange lists of who is assigned to which states and then put t= ogether teams. Steve Montovano and I will work on identifying the governme= nt affairs people for each state in our regions to give to Jim Woods. It was agreed that over the next few weeks, I will put together a document = that will try to preliminarily identify the states and more specifically th= e utilities where there may be opportunities for EES based on a number of i= ssues. The plan is to then share that with Jim Wood and then have a higher= level meeting within EES to target where government affairs puts in its gr= eatest efforts. Once I have a draft, I will share it internally for commen= t before sending it on to Jim Woods. Areas of interest to Jim were all of New England, Pennsylvania, New York an= d Ohio. Illinois is emerging as one of their best markets and they are als= o interested in looking real hard at Michigan. =20 With respect to Michigan, I met with the Michigan EES team and it appears t= hat from a product development standpoint, they will be ready to go at the = beginning of 2002, but the commodity desk is saying 2004 due to uncertainty= on the RTO front, although they conceded that if progress is made, we coul= d move the date up. There was also a discussion of doing financial deals i= n Michigan for the first years until we are comfortable going physical. I will keep you posted as this progresses, but I am optimistic that this co= operative effort will lead to greater opportunities for EES. Janine
|