|
|
Enron Mail |
Narsimha,
Have a look at this. Have we been using the correct rates? ---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 02/06/2001 11:00 PM --------------------------- "Englander, Scott" <sle@tca-us.com< on 02/06/2001 08:40:06 PM To: "Daniel Staines (E-mail)" <dstaine@ect.enron.com<, "Howard Fromer (E-mail)" <hfromer@enron.com<, "Scott Monson (E-mail)" <Scott.A.Monson@enron.com<, "Charles Decker (E-mail)" <cdecker@enron.com<, "Chris Dorland (E-mail)" <Chris.Dorland@enron.com<, "Dennis Benevides (E-mail)" <dbenevid@enron.com<, "Gautam Gupta (E-mail)" <Gautam.Gupta@enron.com<, "George Hopley (E-mail)" <ghopley@enron.com<, "George Wood (E-mail)" <George.Wood@enron.com<, "H. Jeffrey Ader (E-mail)" <jeffery.ader@enron.com<, "Janelle Scheuer (E-mail)" <janelle.scheuer@enron.com<, "Joe Gordon (E-mail)" <Joe.Gordon@enron.com<, "Joe Quenet (E-mail)" <Joe.Quenet@enron.com<, "John Llodra (E-mail)" <John.Llodra@enron.com<, "John Zurita (E-mail)" <jzurita@enron.com<, "Kayne Coulter (E-mail)" <kcoulte@enron.com<, "Larry F. Campbell (E-mail)" <Larry.F.Campbell@enron.com<, "Mark Dana Davis (E-mail)" <Mark.Dana.Davis@enron.com<, "Paul Broderick (E-mail)" <Paul.J.Broderick@enron.com<, "Paul Thomas (E-mail)" <Paul.D.Thomas@enron.com<, "Richard Ring (E-mail)" <richard.ring@enron.com<, "Robert Stalford (E-mail)" <robert.stalford@enron.com<, "Suneet Sharma (E-mail)" <ssharma@enron.com<, "Thane Twiggs (E-mail)" <Thane.Twiggs@enron.com<, "Tom Dutta (E-mail)" <tom.dutta@enron.com<, "Tom May (E-mail)" <tom.may@enron.com<, "Zal Masani (E-mail)" <Zal.Masani@enron.com< cc: Subject: FW: TSC CHARGES FYI: This looks serious. -----Original Message----- From: Manley, Matt [mailto:matt.manley@neg.pge.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:54 PM To: NYISO (E-mail); NYISO (Dave Evanoski) (E-mail); NYISO (LIST SERVER) (E-mail) Cc: Chung, Linda Subject: TSC CHARGES "Manley, Matt" <matt.manley@neg.pge.com< writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The TSC rates posted on the Oasis site "Effective Feb 1, 2001" do not match the TSC rates computed by the TSC Calculator under "Services" and Market Data Toolbox. In some cases the rates are off by $2 or more (especially the newly posted rates effective since Dec 2000). I noticed that there are 6 new postings from Jan 16 through Jan 18 for TSCs (effective September 2000 through Feb 2001). Prior to the postings on Jan 16 through Jan 18, the posted TSC rates had not been updated since July 27, 2000. Please do not tell me that we can expect several rebills from transmission providers for each of the months Sept 2000 through Feb 2001 and that the TSC rate was posted inaccurately for the past 7 months. Am I reading this incorrectly. The TSC rates are a very important rate for market transparency and greatly factor into whether or not deals are set up. These prices need to be accurately portrayed prior to the start of the month. Is the TSC calculator correct or are the TSC rates posted under "OASIS" correct? Check out the TSC rates between NY and external pools on the TSC calculator and the prices posted on the OASIS. Which are correct? PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
|