|
|
Enron Mail |
See message below. I will look to see if there is a better explanation.
Keoni Almeida California Independent System Operator phone: 916/608-7053 pager: 916/814-7352 alpha page: 9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net e-mail: <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com< "Almeida, Keoni" <KAlmeida@caiso.com< on 02/08/2001 03:25:43 PM To: "Johnson, Donna" <Donna.Johnson@enron.com<, "Nelson , Kourtney" <Kourtney.Nelson@enron.com< cc: "Stokley, Chris" <chris.stokley@enron.com< Subject: FW: OOM cost allocation I got another error indicating: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: OOM cost allocation Sent: 2/8/01 3:22 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Nelson , Kourtney on 2/8/01 3:24 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Corporate:CSIFIAPP667 I will send out the pieces to this e-mail separately. Keoni Almeida California Independent System Operator phone: 916/608-7053 pager: 916/814-7352 alpha page: 9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net e-mail: <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com< < -----Original Message----- < From: Almeida, Keoni < Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:47 PM < To: Johnson, Donna; Nelson , Kourtney < Subject: OOM cost allocation < < OOM cost is allocated to the market using CT407 up to the MCP, which was < up to $250 until 12/21/00 then $150 thereafter. Anything above the MCP is < allocated to CT487. Prior to this new charge type CT 1010 was used to < allocate OOM calls reater than the price cap. < We pay OOM charges using 401. SCs deviating arepaid the dec price for < overshceduling and for those underscheduling they get charged the inc < price. When the dec and inc price differ, it gets picked up in 1010.
|