|
|
Enron Mail |
Michael
David (F) forwarded me a query from yourself re. long form descriptions. I attach a note that I sent to David Minns recently summarising how a long form description will be built on Online using attributes of the underlying products and concatenating descriptive passages associated with them. Can we have long descriptions in this format? M Mark Dilworth 02/02/2000 01:38 PM To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan Ford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Australian Power: EOL Long Form Description David Being consistent with the local Australian Power conventions is key - so please proceed with your original format. I have whittled down the attachments to just reiterate my original comments on the ordering that would currently be generated by the system (which would concatenate descriptive text elements according to the underlying attributes of a product selected). I feel certain we will be able to accomodate any specific ordering requirements - either through manipulating the descriptive passages or writing rules specific to your product types - if the current rules will suffice, however, that will save some effort. rgds M I have reviewed the language sent by Paul. The description is broken down into 8 paragraphs - for the record: Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 7 all cover details usually covered in the Product Type description (7 is actually settlement date[s] for which we do not have a separate attribute). Paragraph 4 is reference period. Paragraph 5 is Index. Paragraph 6 is loadshape. These look fine to me - subject to my observations on whether we can use the 'Averaging' language. Paragraph 8 covers 2 attributes - currency (looks fine) and Unit of Measure - for which I suggest we go with our current language for MWh - which details that the volume submitted by the counterparty is MWh per hour. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT on 02/16/2000 10:31 AM --------------------------- David Forster 02/15/2000 02:50 PM To: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EnronOnline Mark, Do you know what this is about - or what changes on the system are represented by the attached documents? Dave ---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 02/15/2000 02:48 PM --------------------------- Michael Sim@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 02/15/2000 06:18 AM To: Elena Kapralova@ECT, Dale Neuner@ECT cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, david forster/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: EnronOnline Elena, Dale We have just tested the EOL test web site and still have not seen the changes to the Long Form Descriptions. If there is anything we can do to help get this put through, ASAP, please don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards Michael Sim ---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Sim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 15/02/2000 16:16 --------------------------- Michael Sim 09/02/2000 15:10 To: Elena Kapralova@ECT, Dale Neuner@ECT cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: EnronOnline Hi I am working in Australia with Paul Smith to get EOL rolled out. Paul has asked me to send you the following documentation covering the final LF descriptions. Should you need anything else, please don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards Michael Sim
|