Enron Mail

From:david.minns@enron.com
To:mark.dilworth@enron.com
Subject:Re: Australian Legal Documents
Cc:david.forster@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, paul.smith@enron.com
Bcc:david.forster@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, paul.smith@enron.com
Date:Mon, 13 Mar 2000 01:06:00 -0800 (PST)

Just few comments

2.We decided to require Conterparties to provide address details in the PA

3. We can delete the GST clause. The collateral clause is only for certain
counterparties

In the second paragragh there is a reference to "paragraphs 2.1 to 2.6". If
the GST and the collateral clause are deleted this should be "2.1 to 2.4" or
"2.1 to 2.5" with the collateral clause.




Mark Dilworth@ECT
03/10/2000 08:31 PM
To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Australian Legal Documents

1 - need version control details (and obviously lose the appendix and other
inappropriate headings).

2 - PA has contact details appended which will take it beyond the standard 1
page that has been a requirement to date. (Or the formatting will be
strange).

3 - I have this copy of GTC which includes the collateral clause - though no
GST.

As per my note ysterday, I will be loading latest versions to allow product
set up etc. to go ahead.

M







David Forster
03/09/2000 11:10 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Australian Legal Documents

Attached are copies of the ETA, PA and GTC which were attached to David
Minns' email of Feb. 28.

David: Please let me know if this date (and therefore these copies) represent
your final drafts.

Mark: Please let me know if you have any comments on the attached, or if you
are happy to approve them as is.




I note that the GTC still needs a GST clause.

Thanks,

Dave