![]() |
Enron Mail |
Just few comments
2.We decided to require Conterparties to provide address details in the PA 3. We can delete the GST clause. The collateral clause is only for certain counterparties In the second paragragh there is a reference to "paragraphs 2.1 to 2.6". If the GST and the collateral clause are deleted this should be "2.1 to 2.4" or "2.1 to 2.5" with the collateral clause. Mark Dilworth@ECT 03/10/2000 08:31 PM To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Australian Legal Documents 1 - need version control details (and obviously lose the appendix and other inappropriate headings). 2 - PA has contact details appended which will take it beyond the standard 1 page that has been a requirement to date. (Or the formatting will be strange). 3 - I have this copy of GTC which includes the collateral clause - though no GST. As per my note ysterday, I will be loading latest versions to allow product set up etc. to go ahead. M David Forster 03/09/2000 11:10 PM To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Australian Legal Documents Attached are copies of the ETA, PA and GTC which were attached to David Minns' email of Feb. 28. David: Please let me know if this date (and therefore these copies) represent your final drafts. Mark: Please let me know if you have any comments on the attached, or if you are happy to approve them as is. I note that the GTC still needs a GST clause. Thanks, Dave
|