![]() |
Enron Mail |
Tana if Australian Counterparties(by that I mean entities that are
incorporated under Australian legislation) request access to EnronOnline then pass them through to me. However I would have already vetted any new counterparties coming from Australia. What I would prefer is a brief email so I can check the name is correct and if they are a government body their authority to trade products not linked to their business purpose. Who will determine whether the password agreements are executed properly? To me that is a far more significant issue. For example what if the password agreement is signed by a junior trader? Has this been considered? Clearly I will aim to respond wthin 24 hours but clearly Friday will not work because it is our Saturday. To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Counterparty Approvals You have been getting the excel spreadsheets on new counterparties now for several days, and at an agreed time I would like to include your approvals in with the rest of Legal's. Right now I am still telling the EnronOnline people that they have to look to Australia for approvals. Once we are in agreement about the parameters of my responses, and who your backup is, we can agree on a date when I will start responding for Australia too. The theory will be that once I send you the email you will have 24 hours to respond or I will consider all the online products approved for Ausralian counterparties. Because of the time change issue, I think we need to make the time my approval will go out 4:00 p.m. the next day (which will be your morning) from the transmittal of the list.
|