|
|
Enron Mail |
David:
Yes, the UCC (Article 2) would be the basis for not requiring a signed confirmation from the counterparty receiving the confirmation if the physical product is a "good" under the UCC. This I think answers your second question also. Regards, Alan gilbergd@sullcrom.com 07/20/2000 10:38 PM To: alan.aronowitz@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com cc: LINDAUERE@sullcrom.com Subject: Electronic Signatures Thanks for sending the chart. I will send you the list of questions we discussed tomorrow. In the interim, I had a couple of questions on the chart: On the first line (physical, no master), is the basis for not requriing the confirm to be signed the UCC? Also, what is meant by "unless commodity not 'good'"? Thanks. ---------------------------------- This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
|