Re: New PA form

Can youn craft a generic document to handle both cases?

Dave

Mark Taylor
03/02/2000 01:09 AM
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New PA form

I had assumed we were going to have a separate PA for the Auction-only
counterparties. The PA contains an unfortunate reference to the ETA which
will need to change if they will only be accepting the Auction-only agreement.

David Forster
02/29/2000 10:00 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: New PA form

Mark/Justin,

Attached is a copy of the Australian PA. It includes the addition of an
Address for Service.

Do you think we should incorporate this in our other PA's as well?

I realise that in many instances we are already doing business with the
relevant company - and the same or similar information might be included on
the Registration form (where completed) - but are you concerned about
ambiguity in the event that no Registration form is completed?

Also: We will need to have some way to distinguish PA's which arrive for
customers who want access to Auctions only. What do you think about adding a
statement like: "(Optional): Tick this box if you wish to have access only to
EnronOnline auctions and not to the main transactions site" [tick box].

If you wish to proceed with either of the above, we will need to revise all
PA's and post them on the website.

Thanks,

Dave