Enron Mail |
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/28/99 02:49 PM --------------------------- Paul Simons 06/28/99 01:14 PM To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Eklavya Sareen/LON/ECT@ECT, Soma Ghosh/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT (bcc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT) Subject: Credit Derivatives (CDs) in Sweden I have been through the advice received from Swedish counsel. The position of CDs under Swedish law can be summarised as follows. 1. Regulation CDs are regulated in Sweden in the same way as commodity derivatives. As discussed we are currently working through these issues as they relate to commodity derivatives with local counsel and I will be pressing them to take a less cautious approach than they have taken to date (particularly in light of our expanding presence in Sweden). As you know, our target is to avoid Swedish licencing requirements and the accompanying regulatory capital requirements. In the meantime, this uncertainty will not prevent us from dealing in Norway with Swedish parties based in Norway. 2. Insurance CDs are not analysed as contracts of insurance under Swedish law. 3. Guarantees CDs are not analysed as contracts of guarantee under Swedish law. 4. Gaming CDs are not analysed as gaming contracts under Swedish law and (unusually) we do not even need to go so far as to satisfy ourselves that the contract is being entered into by the counterparty for a valid commercial purpose (i e hedging). However, it should be noted that several types of entity may not enter derivatives at all for speculative purposes (e g municipalities, insurance companies). 5. Confidentiality This could be an issue for Enron even where we are selling the CD, where we have good reason to believe there is breach of the purchaser's duty of confidentiality owed to the reference credit (i e where we are not in good faith). The position would of course be potentially more problematical where we are purchasing the CD. That said, it would be difficult in either case for the reference credit to establish loss (e g damage to reputation), so it would be hard for them to launch a claim. Our exposure could be restricted further by passing on no more information about underlying reference contracts than is absolutely necesssary. I am pusuing this further with Clifford Chance, in particular to find out what the practice is in the London and New York credit derivative markets where the issue of confidentaility arises and I will revert to you when I have more information. Perhaps Merrills could shed some light on this? 6. Subrogation & Assignment Since CDs are not guarantees there is no right of subrogation. It is possible to take an assignment of the counterparty's rights against the reference credit, but this will not work so as to allow Enron a right of set off against the reference credit where Enron is aware of the reference credit's insolvency at the time of the assignment (a reasonable bet) or where the latter becomes bankrupt within three months of the assignment. In effect, this will make it very difficult indeed to extract any value at all (including by way of set off) from the reference credit. Please feel free to call me on x 6566 to discuss this and to pass this note on to other interested staff. Best regards Paul
|