|
|
Enron Mail |
Anita:
I seem to remember that our traders in Singapore did a deal with a PRC company a while back and it was our conclusion at the time that it was a very dangerous (perhaps unenforceable) thing to do. My vague memory is that only financial institutions could enter into derivatives in the PRC and even then there was invariably a sovereign immunity risk. Do you remember this and can you refresh my recollection? Mark ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/19/98 06:55 PM --------------------------- From: Heather J Mitchell AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 11/09/98 04:50 PM To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor@ECT cc: Doug Leach@ECT, "Margarita G Jannasch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL Subject: LNG hedging for China Mark, Cynthia Scneider recommended I check with you on the ability of Chinese government-owned entities to enter into derivative contracts with Enron. Has ECT done any research on China? Please see the e-mail below for details on counterparty, size, term, etc. Thanks, Heather Mitchell ---------------------- Forwarded by Heather J Mitchell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/98 04:42 PM --------------------------- Heather J Mitchell 11/05/98 03:36 PM To: Cynthia L Schneider@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Doug Leach@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: LNG hedging for China Cynthia, The EI LNG Group is looking at providing LNG price risk management for China. Could you please confirm whether China National Oil Company (Corp.?) and China State Power Corp. are creditworthy counterparties? Before Doug and I talk to the traders I want to see whether we would even be willing to sell LNG risk management to them. The structure the group is most likely interested in is 500,000 MT to 1,000,000 MT per year for five to 20 years (depending on what our traders are comfortable with). I imagine the Chinese would be interested in a cap or collar, and not a fixed price. What other info do you need for a quick estimate? Thanks, Heather
|