Enron Mail |
Don't be too hard on him just yet. Remember that we talked about many
similar issues here when they first came up. Maybe after we've been through these with him once he will negotiate them in the first case and only bring the tough sticking points to us. Louise Kitchen 01/17/2000 02:25 PM To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Eastern - Summary of their Response to PA/ETA Please deal with this for me - but my initial thoughts are that we cannot address the majority of these. Thanks ---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT on 01/17/2000 08:22 PM --------------------------- David Forster 01/14/2000 06:43 PM To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Eastern - Summary of their Response to PA/ETA I'm running out of time - can you handle? Thanks, Dave ---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 14/01/2000 18:41 --------------------------- Justin Boyd 14/01/2000 11:36 To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Eastern - Summary of their Response to PA/ETA PA They wish to amend the PA such that: Enron warrants that their use of the passwords and the Website does not cause them to breach any third party rights they only notify us of unauthorised disclosure or use of passwords upon their learning of the same. they can withdraw or amend information provided to Enron from time to time ETA They do not want to be bound by future terms and conditions imposed by Enron (see 1(iii)) They wish to restrict our use of information to Enron Group companies (see last sentence of 2(b)) They feel unable to make the statement in the first sentence of 2(d), since they trade through various group company agents on behalf of a BV principal To establish a tangible audit trail and for verification, they wish to be able to verify our paper confirms (see 3(e)) They wish to restructure the indemnity entirely (see 4), such that each party is liable for losses suffered by the other due to its own wilful default/negligence/omission. They wish to have the right to terminate the ETA (see 6(a)), and wish that electronic notices be deemed sent when the sender receives notice from the system of delivery or failed delivery (see 6(e)). Some of these are more important than others, but there are some key points. Please let me know what you think - thanks Justin
|