|
|
Enron Mail |
Attached is the story with my comments.
1. I changed 'standard" to 'familiar' and deleted the reference to price discovery since these are elements of futures contracts, comparison to which we would like to avoid. If the price reference is important, 'transparency' would work as a replacement for 'discovery.' 2. The changes to the last paragraph are to avoid the suggestion that the PA and Reg. forms can be filled out online (they are available to be downloaded but must be signed and sent to us offline). Suryan Wirya Simunovic 07/07/2000 09:07 AM To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: International Coal Ticker Story Gentlemen, We have the following Newsticker story we want to launch on EnronOnline ASAP. Could you confirm if the wording is appropriate from the PR and legal points of view. Would appreciate your soonest to reply to myself or Amita so that we can proceed. Thank you Suryan ---------------------- Forwarded by Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT on 07/07/2000 14:39 --------------------------- Peter Bradley 07/07/2000 14:34 To: Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: international coal ticker story I we going to get this one out today or tomorrow. would really prefer today if possible. peter
|