Enron Mail

From:kim.ward@enron.com
To:tbroderi@czn.com
Subject:Re: Re:
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT)

I will have it checked out. Are you getting things ok now?




"Tom Broderick" <tbroderi@czn.com< on 04/10/2001 02:40:12 PM
To: <Kim.Ward@enron.com<
cc:
Subject: Re: Re:


Our IT gurus believe our email was ok last week and I did receive outside
emails, so this suggests it was something internal to Enron or something in
your communication out.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Kim.Ward@enron.com<
To: <tbroderi@czn.com<
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Re:


<
< that is good news.
<
<
<
<
< "Tom Broderick" <tbroderi@czn.com< on 04/09/2001 09:23:20 AM
<
< To: <Kim.Ward@enron.com<
< cc:
< Subject: Re: Re:
<
<
< The gremlins now seem to be asleep, so email is actually functioning
again.
< ----- Original Message -----
< From: <Kim.Ward@enron.com<
< To: <tbroderi@czn.com<
< Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:07 AM
< Subject: Re:
<
<
< <
< < Hello
< <
< <
< <
< <
< < "Tom Broderick" <tbroderi@czn.com< on 04/09/2001 07:32:41 AM
< <
< < To: <Kim.Ward@enron.com<
< < cc:
< < Subject: Re:
< <
< <
< < The three messages you sent arrived Saturday 4/7 at 10:28, only 4 days
< < after
< < you sent them. I will check here to see if anyone has any explanation.
< < ----- Original Message -----
< < From: <Kim.Ward@enron.com<
< < To: <tbroderi@czn.com<
< < Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:34 AM
< <
< <
< < < (See attached file: kingman_indications.xls)
< < <
< < <
< <
< <
< <
< <
<
<
<
<