Enron Mail

From:kay.chapman@enron.com
To:david.delainey@enron.com, philippe.bibi@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,raymond.bowen@enron.com, michael.brown@enron.com, rick.buy@enron.com, wes.colwell@enron.com, david.cox@enron.com, janet.dietrich@enron.com, w.duran@enron.com, jim.fallon@enron.com
Subject:Peer Group Mapping
Cc:kenneth.lay@enron.com, cliff.baxter@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com,ken.rice@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, stanley.horton@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com, kevin.hannon@enron.com, andrew.fas
Bcc:kenneth.lay@enron.com, cliff.baxter@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com,ken.rice@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, stanley.horton@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com, kevin.hannon@enron.com, andrew.fas
Date:Thu, 24 May 2001 06:26:00 -0700 (PDT)

On May 10, 2001, a memo was sent out regarding "Peer Group Mapping". This
mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each
activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

Please refer to the attached original memo, if you have not responded to
David Oxley and have any comments
please respond to him by May 25, 2001.

Dave Delainey



Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group
mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a
functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed
at the last PRC Committee Meeting to stay with the current structure since
the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most
activities had been placed with the exception of just 2 or 3. It was agreed
that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an
organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All
functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the
acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1 to review and agree the attached mapping

2 consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in
previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them
as indicated on the attachment.

3 invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider
questionable or requiring further explanation.

Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final
VP/MD PRC Meetings. Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for
your ease of
reference.