Enron Mail

To:mark.frevert@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com
Subject:FW: Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update
Date:Thu, 14 Jun 2001 03:55:00 -0700 (PDT)

-----Original Message-----
From: Lundstrom, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James; Haedicke, Mark E.; Walls Jr., Rob
Cc: Rogers, Rex
Subject: Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update

Gentlemen -

A few updates:

The second Bombay High Court hearing was held today. The court asked DPC to
go away for a week and try to continue discussions with MSEB. The parties
are to return to the court in a week for another hearing. We are not
entirely sure why the court made this request -- it has nothing to do with
the MERC jurisdiction issue before the court. One possible positive
interpretation: The court feels the need to generate some positive publicity
("I tried to encourage a positive outcome") before ruling in our favor on the
jurisdiction issue. But, again, the court's motives are not clear.

We still don't know if some or all of the lenders will try to cure the
construction contract defaults this week. I would expect that we would
receive formal termination letters over the weekend from the contractors if
the contractors are not paid in full this week.

Some of you are aware that DPC's relationship with its Indian outside counsel
has recently shown some strain. That strain did not affect the quality of
DPC's representation at the Bombay High Court hearing. However, I'm also
pretty sure that the strain has not been permanently "fixed" and that further
efforts will be required in this regard. Gail Brownfeld and Jim McCartney
are helping DPC with these issues.