Enron Mail

From:virginia.thompson@enron.com
To:fran.chang@enron.com
Subject:DMS 10706 Louisiana Pacific deal
Cc:bill.williams@enron.com, a..allen@enron.com, scotty.gilbert@enron.com
Bcc:bill.williams@enron.com, a..allen@enron.com, scotty.gilbert@enron.com
Date:Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:10:00 -0700 (PDT)


Fran-


Though this is a mess, I will attempt to explain the changes I have made (given the information that I received from Bill Williams III this morning):

I took deal # 421598.1 from 4 to a 7 MW by adding an extra 3 MW's at a $0 price. LP owes us $0 for the energy that was ramped down because we buy it back from them. I added deal # 754187.1 to purchase back the 3 MW at a $0 price. I put in a $0 price because we paid LP for these 3 MW's thru annuity # 531549.1 that pays LP 70% of what we sold the 3 MW for on real time (deals # 530654.1, 530716.1 and 530689.1) Please remember these changes span 2 days: 2-23-01 and 2-24-01.

I changed deal # 530689.1 from W Hourly book to ST NW because ST NW recognizes both purchase from PGE (529161.1) and sale to Puget (530689.1). There is an intra-desk annuity # 531524.1 with which ST NW is compensating ST W Hourly for remarketing the power and an intra-desk deal # 531546.1 with which ST W Hourly is compensating LT NW for the basis price of $48.

Below is a snapshot of what the deals now look like in scheduling.
I hope this helps to explain everything.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Virginia






<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)<